HomeMy WebLinkAbout(P1) IA Presentation Port Arthur -Council Presentation PPPort Arthur, Texas
2021 Redistricting
BICKERSTAFF HEATH DELGADO ACOSTA LLP
3711 S. MoPac Expressway
Building One, Suite 300
Austin, Texas 78746
(512) 472-8021
www.bickerstaff.com www.votinglaw.com
Initial
Assessment
Introduction – Attorney and Firm
The purpose of this presentation is to
Review the population of the councilmember districts based on the recently released 2010 Census
Review the City’s obligation to re-draw the boundaries of the six council districts so that the population in each of the six districts is balanced
Explain the legal requirements that come into play in that process
Explain how the City’s process will meet these legal requirements
1
REDISTRICTINGApplicable Law Three Principles, plus
2
RedistrictingOne Person - One Vote
U.S. Constitution – single-member districts must have approximately equal populations
Rule of thumb: total deviation < 10%
Compare most populous and least populous districts to “ideal”–sized district
Add both departures from ideal together
City single-member districts are legislative districts that are subject to the one-person one vote requirements of the fourteenth amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
As such, each councilmember district must have equal population.
The release of the census figures each decade triggers the City’s obligation to review the councilmember districts and rebalance them if necessary.
3
Example Deviation Calculation
4
What Population Do You Use?
To determine whether the council districts are in balance, we will utilize total population figures provided in the census data. This is the information that has been utilized by every
political subdivision in the United States in submissions to the United States Department of Justice which reviews our changes.
To the extent that the City will need to analyze voting rights issues we will utilize the voting age population figures in the census and may also rely on Spanish Surnamed Registered
Voter information and/or turnout information at the county election precinct level and other indicators of potential voting strength within the District.
5
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act
No discrimination on basis of race or language minority status
Generally, avoid cracking or packing
Cracking or fracturing is dividing minority voters to fragment their voting power.
Packing is concentrating minority voters when dividing them would permit the group to elect their candidates of choice in more than one district
Other practices can also violate Section 2
Discuss
6
14th Amendment (Shaw v. Reno)
Once we determine our Section 5 and Section 2 issues, then we must examine the countervailing principle which is the Shaw v. Reno line of cases.
7
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act
Preclearance no longer required (Shelby County v. Holder (2013))
Section 5 standard is “retrogression”
Are minorities worse off under the new system?
No discriminatory purpose or effect
Still a useful diagnostic tool to identify potential Section 2 issues
While there are two alternatives available for preclearing the redistricting plan, political subdivisions almost always opt for submission to the Department of Justice instead of going
through the court proceedings.
In making a submission to the department, the City will have the burden of demonstrating that any plan you adopt is not retrogressive - that is, that the minority voters are not worse
off under the new plan than they were under the existing plan.
8
Adopt Criteria
Explain how we have proposed criteria for consideration by the Commissioners Court. Here are notes on various elements:
Compactness has geographic and functional dimension. A district, even when not geographically compact, can be functionally compact depending on such matters as:
Voting patterns
Income
Education
Home ownership
The availability of transportation and communication
The existence of common social and economic interest
The ability of the constituents to relocate to each other
Examples of easily identifiable geographic boundaries
Highways
Major roads
Rivers
Creeks
Bridges
Golf courses
Stadiums
Parks
Cemeteries
College campuses
Hospitals
Race tracks
Other public buildings & landmarks
Whole Voting Precinct Notes
Prevent and eliminate voter confusion by taking into consideration the boundaries created for other public purposes.
Draw based on existing voting precincts as established by the county.
Notes on keeping incumbents in district
Preserve the will of the voters
Provide consistency in the incumbent-constituent relationship.
9
Plan Development Elements
10
Proposed Redistricting Time Line
2/1 at 9:30 a.m. Present Initial Assessment
TBD First Drawing Workshop
TBD Second Drawing Workshop
TBD Final Adoption
11
Port Arthur, Texas2011 Benchmark with 2020 Census Data
Discuss the data.
12
Current Districts
13
Current Districts
14
Current Districts
15
Current Districts
16
Current Districts
17
Current Districts
18
Current Districts
19
City of Port ArthurOverall Deviation For Current DistrictsUsing 2020 Census Data
20
City of Port ArthurOverall Deviation For Current DistrictsUsing 2020 Census Data
21
City of Port ArthurOverall Deviation For Current DistrictsUsing 2020 Census Data
22
City of Port ArthurOverall Deviation For Current DistrictsUsing 2020 Census Data
23
Hispanic Thematic Map
24
Black Thematic Map
25
Port Arthur, Texas
2021 Redistricting
BICKERSTAFF HEATH DELGADO ACOSTA LLP
3711 S. MoPac Expressway
Building One, Suite 300
Austin, Texas 78746
(512) 472-8021
www.bickerstaff.com www.votinglaw.com
Initial
Assessment
Questions
26