HomeMy WebLinkAbout(3) ROUND 2 CDBG INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDINGState of Texas Plan for Disaster Recovery
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission Method of Distribution for
Round Two Disaster Recovery Supplemental Allocation
Summary Information
Contact Information
Council of Governments: South East Texas Regional Planning Commission (SETRPC)
Principal Contact Name, Title: Shanna Burke, Disaster Recovery Division Director
Principal Contact Telephone: 409-899-8444, ext. 7516
Principal Contact Email: sburke@setrpc.org
Principal Contact Address: 2210 Eastex Freeway
City, State, Zip: Beaumont, TX 77703
Allocation Summary
Regional Allocation for All Activities: $297,298,360
Housing Activities Total: $133,305,751
Non-Housing Activities Total: $129,677,013
Citizen Participation
Below is a description addressing how the Council of Government s complied with the Citizen Participation Plan
regarding citizen and non-governmental organization outreach, and any efforts exceeding TDRA minimum public
The SETRPC sent out email notification of the Solicitation for Comment regarding input for the MOD to numerous
local faith-based organizations, citizen groups, advocacy groups, media outlets and local, federal and state elected
officials as detailed in our Citizen Participation Plan. We also published notice in English, Spanish and Vietnamese in
our local regional newspaper. No further efforts to obtain comments beyond the planned public hearings were made
due to time constraints.
First Public Hearing Information
Date/Time: 12/09/09 - 2:00 p.m. Location: South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
Attendance: 104
Persona! Notice. As required, personal notice was sent to eligible entities at feast five days in advance of the public
hParine urine the followine methodist fat least one must be selected}:
Method Date Sent Documentation
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
® Electronic Mail 12/04/2009 copy of the email, as well as the copy of the email sent to
chance.sparks@tdra.state.tx.us.
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
^ Fax copy of the letter sent by fax, and the fax transmission receipts.
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
^ Hand Delivery copy of the letter given by hand-delivery, and a signature sheet signed by
a representative of the entity that the notice was received.
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
® Certified Mail 22/04/2009 copy of the letter, and copies of each of the signed delivery receipts
Jnternet Notice. As required, public notice was distributed on the Internet at least five days in advance using all of the
followin¢ methods:
Method Date Published Documentation
See attached printed copy of the hearing notice on the website and the
® COG Website 12/04/2009 link emailed to chance sparks@tdra.state.tx.us.
Secretary of See attached printed copy of the hearing notice on the website and the
® State Website 12/04/2009 link emailed to chance.sparks@tdra.state.tx.us.
Published Notice. As required, notice of the public hearing was published in at least one regional newspaper at least
three days in advance. Notice of public hearine was published in the following regional newspapers}:
Newspaper Name Date Published Documentation
® Beaumont Enterprise 12/06/2009 See attached copy of the hearing notice and a publisher's affidavit.
^ See attached copy of the hearing notice and a publisher's affidavit.
Citizen Comment Documentation
® The required copy of a sign-in sheet from the public hearing is attached.
® A summary of the citizen comments and meeting discussion is attached.
Describe any efforts to notify and accommodate those The newspaper notice was published in English, Spanish and
with modified communication needs, such as posting Vietnamese. In addition, the SETRPC had both English and
information and providing interpretive services for Spanish speaking staff in attendance at the public hearing.
other languages.
Second Public Hearing Information
Date/Time: 12/15/2009 - 9:00 a.m. Location:
South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
To Be Determined Day of
Attendance: Hearing
Persona! Notice. As required, personal notice was sent to eligible entities at least five days in advance of the public
hearing using the following method(s) (at least one must be selected):
Method Date Sent Documentation
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
® Electronic Mail 12/04/2009 copy of the email, as well as the copy of the email sent to
chance.sparks@tdra.state.tx.us.
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
^ Fax copy of the letter sent by fax, and the fax transmission receipts.
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
^ Hand Delivery copy of the letter given by hand-delivery, and a signature sheet signed by
a representative of the entity that the notice was received.
See the attached list of individuals receiving notification in this manner,
® Certified Mail 12/04/2009 copy of the letter, and copies of each of the signed delivery receipts
lnfernet Notice. As required, public notice was distributed on the Internet at least five days in advance using all of the
fnlln~uino mothnr~c•
...,..... ..a .......___.
Method
Date Published
Documentation
See attached printed copy of the hearing notice on the website and the
® COG Website 12/04/2009 link emailed to chance.sparksCa~tdra.state.tx.us.
Secretary of See attached printed copy of the hearing notice on the website and the
®
State Website 12/04/2009
link emailed to chance.sparks tdra.state.tx.us.
Published Notice. As required, notice of the public hearing was published in at least one regional newspaper at least
fi,rnn r~~vc in arlvanra NntirP of rnihlic hearine was published in the following regional newspaper(s):
•....... .... ~.. ... ....... ~...______.__
Newspaper Name - r
Date Published Documentation
® Beaumont Enterprise 12/06/2809 See attached copy of the hearing notice and a publisher's affidavit.
^ -_.
See attached copy of the hearing notice and a publisher's affidavit.
Citizen Comment Documentation
^ ~ The required copy of a sign-in sheet from the public hearing is attached.
^ A summary of the citizen comments and meeting discussion is attached.
Describe any efforts to notify and accommodate those The newspaper notice was published in English, Spanish and
with modified communication needs, such as posting Vietnamese.
information and providing interpretive services for
other languages.
Long-Term Planning and Recovery
Below is an explanation of the region's method of distribution fosters long-term community recovery that is forward-
lookingand focused on permanent restoration of infrastructure, housing and the local economy.
The Southeast Texas region has been the direct victim of three hurricanes, two major (Rita and Ike) and one minor
(Wumberto) between 2005-2008. The region was also affected by the western side of Hurricane Gustav. What we have
learned through each of these storms is the effects and types of destruction can be totally different, which directly
drives recovery efforts related to each specific storm. In an effort to foster long-term community recovery that is
forward-looking and sensitive to the fact that recovery is now sought to target permanent restoration of infrastructure,
housing and the local economy, we have focused our efforts as follows. With regard to housing, we are rebuilding
neighborhoods and structures that meet housing quality standards (HQS) and able to better withstand the effects of
storms. We now understand the impacts of wind and storm surge and ways that they affect infrastructure. This has
allowed cities and counties to make adjustments to the way infrastructure is set-up and operates. Establishing
permanent restoration to the local economy is difficult, as different storms affect different aspects of the local economy.
With recovery dollars, ourgoal is to reestablish businesses in areas that were most affected by providing opportunities
for rebuilding and growth. The overall goal of the whole rebuilding effort(s) in Southeast Texas is to establish a
community that can withstand any future weather event as well as maintain or increase the populations of people living
in the
4
Method of Distribution Between Housing and Non-Housing Activities
Page 9 of the State of Texas Plan for Disaster Recovery -Amendment No. 1 identifies the regional funding splits between
housing and non-housing activities. If the COG deviates from the amounts stated in the Action Plan, the method of
distribution must provide afully-supported justification of the change using objective, verifiable data for consideration
by TDRA and TDHCA. If applicable, the process used by the Council of Government to determine a different distribution
between housing and non-housing activities in the region is summarized below: _ _
Not applicable. The SETRPC intends to follow designated housing and non-housing splits designated by TDRA.
Non-Housing Method of Distribution Detail
The Council of Governments is required to prepare a method of distribution for non-housing activity funds between the
eligible entities. TDRA has directed the COG to use a direct allocation technique based on objective, verifiable data. The
Method of Distribution clearly identil:tes appropriate national objectives for each activity type, the entities eligible to
serve as grantees and contract with TDRA, supports minimum allocation amounts that help ensure project feasibility,
provides an explanation of the distribution factors selected, and identifies an appropriate reallocation process for any
unused or ineligible funds.
Distribution Factors
_e~ _r~-_..__....... ,...+~ t,.,~ ~.,L,.-rorl tho fnllntA~ina riietri hiitinn factors:
Distribution FactorG1111c"" 'Weighty`~ Documentation Source Explanation of Factor Selection and
Weighting
LMI percentage for entity 25% Information from ORCA's 2005 TDRA requires LMI percentage for the
Implementation manual. entity be included in the distribution
http~//www orca.state.tx.us/CDROM/ factors. This factor recognizes the
CDBGImplementationManuel 2005/ likely limited resources of entities
incomeCatHudData.xls with large low-moderate income
populations.
Population of entity 25% Information from ORCA's 2005 Communities were affected by
Implementation manual. storms regardless of socioeconomic
htta'//www.orca.state.tx.us/CDROM/ status. Since HUD granted Texas a
CDBGImplementationManuel 2005/ waiver reducing the LMI National
incomeCatHudData.xls Objective amount to 5096, the COG
chose to weight total population
equally with LMI.
Reported Value of Disaster 5096 FEMA Public Worksheets, HTNB The SETRPC determined reported
Impact of entity Engineering Reports, reports from damage would be a sufficient
other Engineering Firms or other formal measure to estimate disaster impact
verifiable damage assessments on infrastructure. The COG desired
to weight impact at 509'0, splitting it
between two different measure in an
effort to target funds to areas with
the greatest need.
All allocations must meet or exceed a floor of $75,000 to help ensure sufficient funds for at least one eligible project.
Project Specific Distributions
From the State's experience with Hurricanes Ike and Dolly and examples from other states, the state has determined
that the citizens and communities of Texas can derive long-term, cost-effective benefits by introducing a comprehensive
and holistic approach to selecting, planning, funding and implementing certain disaster recovery projects. Recognizing
that the regional impact of the storms may lead to identification of regional projects affecting multiple entities, TDRA
has allowed the Council of Governments to make direct allocations to specific regional projects under limited
circumstances. These projects must be of significant scope beyond what may be achieved regionally through the
distribution formula. There must be documented regional agreement of the need and willingness to accept lesser local
formulaic allocations in order to address regional need. Examples include regionalized sheltering and drainage programs
benefiting multiple jurisdictions. The Council of Governments has identified the following project(s) for a Project Specific
Distribution:
Project Name Detailed Description, including Assigned Estimated Cost Estimate*
National Objective and Storm Grantee Beneficiaries
Relationship
N/A N/A N/A Total: N/A N/A
LMI: N/A
* Cost estimate attached and prepared by a relevant professional
Eligible Activities
Grantee activities must be specifically related to Hurricane Ike and/or Dolly, and must meet the following criteria:
• Activity must be a CDBG-eligible project;
• Activity must be in response to a Hurricane Ike and/or Dolly related impact in one of the following ways:
o Direct verifiable damage from the storm that requires improvement of conditions, or
o The facilities must have failed to function in the normal capacity as a result of the storm.
• The COG has added a stipulation that projects must meet aregionally-established recovery priority.
ThP ['ni,nril of Governments has addressed prioritization of eligible activities as follows:
® The Council of Governments has chosen not to limit Grantees in the region to projects meeting regional priority
activities.
-OR-
^ The Council of Governments has limited Grantees in the region to selecting projects meeting the following regional
priority activities:
Water Facilities Specially Authorized Public Facilities & Improvements
^ Sewer Facilities Public Services
Other Public Utilities (gas, et al) ^ Clearance & Demolition Activities
Street Improvements Code Enforcement
Flood and Drainage Improvements Specially Authorized Assistance to Private Utilities
Debris Removal Economic Development
Community Centers and Emergency Shelters Planning and Urban Environmental Design
Senior Centers Fire Protection Facilities and Equipment
Parks, Playgrounds and other Recreational Facilities
In addition to the priorities selected above, the following activity types are considered priorities due to their relationship
in delivering all other activities:
• Acquisition, including buyouts
• Relocation Payments and Assistance
• Engineering and Architectural Services
• Planning and Project Delivery
The State of Texas has received a limited waiver for buildings for the general conduct of government which allows the
State to fund the rehabilitation or reconstruction of public buildings that are otherwise ineligible and that the state
selects in accordance with its approved Action Plan for Disaster Recovery and that the state has determined have
substantial value in promoting disaster recovery. TDRA has received additional guidance from HUD that this limited
waiver was not intended to include all general conduct of government activities. HUD has further particularly identified
fueling stations, points of distribution (PODs), precinct barns, and emergency operation centers (EOC) as general
conduct of government activities that will remain ineligible for supplemental CDBG funding. Additional examples of
common ineligible activities include:
• Purchase of construction equipment
• Operation and maintenance expenses
• Duplicate projects
• Projects that do not comply with local, district, state and/or federal regulations
Parks, playgrounds and other recreational facilities are eligible activity types, but may not use the Urgent Need National
Objective.
Reallocation
The SETRPC has designated the Executive Director to act on behalf of the SETRPC Executive Committee for reallocations
that are less than $500,000. Reallocations require notification to any entity returning funds alerting them to the time,
date and location of the meeting. This notice must be sent at least five days prior to the meeting. The SETRPC may omit
this notice if the entity consents to the reallocation in writing. The reallocation process shall be automatically triggered if
an entity has not submitted anon-housing application to TDRA within two weeks following the TDRA-established urgent
need/elimination of slum & blight national objective application deadline for each respective grantee. Those entities
returning the funds will not be considered for reallocations. The SETRPC will contact each other eligible entity to
determine whether it has capacity and need for additional recovery funding. The SETRPC will consider the following:
a. Whether the funds will expand the scope of an already approved project or is a new project that will
require application revisions and new environmental reviews
b. The number of beneficiaries, particularly low to moderate income beneficiaries
c. The amount of funding the entity has already received
Eor large reallocation amounts, the SETRPC may choose to use the same method of distribution to reallocate non-
housing funds. Those entities returning the funds will be removed from the calculation. The unused amount will then be
assigned to each of the remaining entities in the same manner as the initial allocation.
Housing Method of Distribution Detail
The Council of Governments is required to prepare a method of distribution for housing activity funds between the
eligible entities. TDRA has directed the COG to use a direct allocation technique based on objective, verifiable data. The
Method of Distribution clearly identifies the entities eligible to serve as grantees and contract with TDRA, supports
minimum allocation amounts that help ensure project feasibility, provides an explanation of the distribution factors
selected, and identifies an appropriate reallocation process for any unused or ineligible funds.
Distribution Fattars
h I t d the following distribution factors:
The Council of Government a
Distribution Factor s se ec
Weight Documentation Source Explanation of Factor Selection and
Weighting
Client Need throughout 1009'o Individual FEMA Damage The SETRPC determined reported
Southeast Texas Region Homeowner Letters, Insurance damage would be a sufficient measure
(Clients served on first Documentation and On-Site to estimate need. As has been done
come first served basis Housing Assessments with both Rita and Ike Round I
, programs, homeowners apply for
based on application for funding and are served on a first come
assistance submittal.) first served basis regardless of where
they reside in the region. All clients
served will be LMI, unless a waiver
extending the time period for Urgent
e
Need is granted by HUD.
All allocations must meet or exceed a floor of $500,000 to help ensure sufficient funds for at least one feasible housing
program.
Eligible Activities
Grantee activities must be specifically related to Hurricane Ike and/or Dolly, and must meet the following criteria:
• Activity must be a CDBG-eligible project;
• Activity must be in response to a Hurricane Ike and/or Dolly related impact in one of the following ways:
o Direct verifiable damage from the storm that requires improvement of conditions, or
o The facilities must have failed to function in the normal capacity as a result of the storm.
The Council of Government has addressed prioritization of eligible activities as follows:
The Council of Governments has chosen not to limit Grantees in the region to projects meeting regional priority
®
activities.
-OR-
The Council of Governments has limited Grantees in the region to selecting projects meeting the following regional
~
priority activities:
Single-family repair and rehabilitation ^ Multi-family repair and rehabilitation
^ Single-family replacement Multi-family replacement
Single-family elevation of homes in flood plains ^ New Multi-family to replace multi-family stock
Single family relocation from flood plains or identified
environmental hazards
Activities for demolition are not included above. Should dollars far demolition be needed in the Southeast Texas region,
the SETRPC requests that funding be allowed for such.
TDHCA recommends entities consult with them if incentive programs are considered as part of any housing program
design.
Reallocation
All funding far housing activities in the Southeast Texas Region will be administered by the South East Texas Regional
Planning Commission, therefore, no reallocation to other entities in the region will be applicable.
10
Approval and Signatory Authority
A Resolution of the Council of Governments is attached approving the method of distribution and authorizing its
submittal to the Texas Department of Rural Affairs. 1 certify that the contents of this document and all related
attachments are complete and accurate.
Signature
Shaun P. Davis
Printed Name
sdavis@setrpc.org
Email Address
12/16/2009
Date
Executive Director
Title
409-899-8444, ext. 6041
Telephone Number
11
Regional Method of Distribution Formulaic Summary
Housing Activities
First Distribution Factor: Client Need
Maximum Factor Measure: 133305751.0000
City, County or Factor Weight: 100% Proportional Regional Non-
Eligihle Entity
Factor Measure Factor Measure
Weighted Factor Regional Weighted Weighted Factor Housing Allocation Proportional
(FM) Maximum (FMmax) Weight {W) Wx{FMJFMmax) Weighted Factor Factor Total (PWF) for Formulaic D'u~tribut+on PWF
Total WFtot) RWFtot) Wftot/RWFtot Distribution RA x RA
SETRPC $ 133,305,751.00 $ 133,305,751.00 lOD% 1 1 1 1 $133,305,751.00 $133,305,751.00
1 1.00 $133,305,751.00
Regional Method of Distribution Formulaic Summary
Non-Housing Activities
First Distribution Factor: Low-Moderate Income Proportion of Entity Second Distribution Factor: Population Estimates of Entity
Maximum Factor Measure: 61.3800 Maximum Factor Measure: 38803.0000
C'rty, County or Factor Weight: 0.25 Factor Weight: 0.25
Eligible Entity
Factor Measure
FM
( ) Factor Measure
Maximum
(FMmax)
Weight (W)
Weighted Factor
Wx FM FMmax
( / ~
Factor Measure
(FM) Factor Measure
Maximum
(FMmax)
Weight (W)
Weighted Factor
Wx(FM/FMmax)
Lumberton 39.43 61.3800 0.25 0.160597915 8833 110826 0.25 0.019925379
Unincorporated
Hardin County
40.77
61.3800
0.25
0.166D55718
29144
110826
0.25
0.065742696
Kountze 52.7 61.3800 0.25 0.214646465 1996 110826 0.25 0.004502554
Silsbee 52.02 61.3800 O.ZS 0.211876833 6023 110826 0.25 0.013586613
Sour Lake 50.3 61.3800 0.25 0.204871294 1646 110826 0.25 0.003713D28
Beaumont 48.04 61.3800 0.25 0.195666341 110826 110826 0.25 0.25
Unincorporated
Jefferson County
35.2
61.3800
0.25
0.143369176
19600
110826
0.25
0.044213452
Nederland 35.8 61.3800 0.25 0.145812968 17303 110826 0.25 D.0390319D6
Port Arthur 53.23 61.3800 0.25 0.216805148 57023 110826 0.25 0.128631819
Port Neches 25.76 61.3800 0.25 0.104920169 13537 110826 0.25 0.030536607
Bevil Oaks 18.2 61.3800 0.25 O.D74128381 1349 110826 0.25 0.003043058
China 43.4 61.3800 0.25 0.176767677 1137 110826 0.25 0.002564831
Nome 23.7 61.3800 0.25 0.096529814 476 110826 0.25 0.001073755
Groves 27.84 61.3800 0.25 0.113391984 15661 110826 0.25 0.035327901
Bridge City 29.91 61.3800 0.25 0.121823069 8494 110826 0.25 0.019160656
Orange 43.43 61.3800 0.25 0.176889866 17925 110826 0.25 0.040435006
Unincorporated
Orange County
34.55
61.3800
0.25
0.140721733
38803
110826
0.25
D.087531355
Pinehurst 48.3 61.3800 0.25 0.196725318 2273 110826 0.25 D.OD5127407
West Orange 41.38 61.3800 0.25 0.168540241 4189 110826 0.25 0.009449497
Rose City 61.38 61.3800 0.25 0.25 521 110826 0.25 0.001175266
Vidor 46.96 61.3800 0.25 0.191267514 11161 110826 0.25 0.025176854
Pine Forest 41.9 61.3800 0.25 0.170658195 619 110826 0.25 0.001396333
Regional Method of Distribution Formulaic Summary
Nan-Housing Activities
Third Distribution Factor: Rep orted Storm Damage of Entity
Maximum Factor Measure: 95045853.1500 Regional Non-
Factor Weight: 0.5 Proportional Housing
Factor Measure Factor Measure
Weighted Factor Regional Weighted Factor Allocation for Proportional
(FM) Maximum Weight (W)
Wx(FM/FMmax} Weighted Factor Weighted Factor (PWF) Formulaic Distribution
FMmax
( } Total (WFtot) Total (RWFtot~ Wftot/RWFtot Distribution {RA) PWF x RA
$19,944,070.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.104918149 0.285441442 6.636385821 0.04301158 $114,677,013.00 $4,932,439.57
$62,528,608.53 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.328939172 0.560737587 6.636385821 0.084494422 $114,677,013.00 $9,689,567.97
$7,814,710.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 O.D4111021 0.260259228 6.636385821 0.039217013 $114,677,013.00 $4,497,289.90
$5,922,000.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.031153384 0.256616831 6.636385821 0.03866816 $114,677,013,00 $4,434,349.12
$3,902,800.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.020531143 0.229115464 6.636385821 0.034524133 $114,677,013.00 $3,959,124.41
$21,400,000.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.112577242 0.558243583 6.636385821 0.084118615 $114,677,013.00 $9,646,471.49
$36,254,945.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.190723445 0.378306072 6.636385821 0.057004834 $114,677,013.00 $6,537,144.09
$14,815,056.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.077936362 0.262781236 6.636385821 0.03959704 $114,677,013.00 $4,540,870.29
$59,670,034.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.313901301 0.659338269 6.636385821 0.09935201 $114,677,013.00 $11,393,391.72
$14,340,000.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.075437273 0.21089405 6.636385821 0.031778449 $114,677,013.00 $3,644,257.53
$195,000.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.001025821 0.07819726 6.636385821 0.011783109 $114,677,013.00 $1,351,251.78
$109,000.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.000573407 0.179905916 6.636385821 0.02710902 $114,677,013.00 $3,108,781.43
$570,000.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 D.002998553 0.100602122 6.636385821 0.015159173 $114,677,013.00 $1,738,408.70
$314,133.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.001652534 0.15037242 6.636385821 0.022658782 $114,677,013.00 $2,598,441.44
$13,675,770.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.071943012 0.212926748 6.636385821 0.032084745 $114,677,013.00 $3,679,382.74
$10,597,512.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.055749471 0.273074343 6.636385821 0.041148051 $114,677,013.00 $4,718,735.60
$95,045,853.15 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.5 0.728253089 6.636385821 0.1097364 $114,677,013.00 $12,584,242.57
$4,873,200.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.025636047 0.227458772 6.636385821 0.034279015 $114,677,013.00 $3,931,015.10
$18,987,543.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.099886225 0.277875964 6.636385821 0.041871581 $114,677,013.00 $4,801,707.79
$3,344,003.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.017591525 0.268766791 6.636385821 0.04049897 $114,677,013.00 $4,644,300.92
$15,944,184.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 0.083876274 0.300320641 6.636385821 0.045253644 $114,677,013.00 $5,189,552.72
$915,000.00 $95,045,853.15 0.5 O.D04813466 0.176867994 6.636385821 0.026651252 $114,677,013.00 $3,056,286.03
6.636385821 1.00 $114,677,013.00
Second Disaster Recovery Supplemental Allocation
Regional Method of Distribution Allocation Summary
Region: South East Texas Regional Planning Commission
Required Non-Housin Housin pq)
Required Avoiloble !f Available Re aired Required Required Required Required Required Required
Percentage of
Uty,Countyor
Applying Entity for
Economic
General Non-
Non-Housing
Regional Non-
Applying Entity for
Housing Percentage of
Percentage ofToWl
Ellgihle Entity Non-Housing Development Housing Subtotal Housing Housing Subtotal Regional Housing Total Allocation Regional Aikxation
Allocation Allocation
Lumberton Lumberton $0 $4,932,440 $4,932,440 3.80% Lumberton $D O.OD% 54,932, L88"
Unincorporated Unincorporated Unincorporated
Hardin Caun Hardin County $0 $9,689,568 $9,689,568 7.47% Hardin Coun $D 0.00% $9,689,5 3.689'.
Kountze Kountze $0 $4,497,290 $4,497,290 3.47% Kountze $0 0.00% $4,497,290 1.71X
Silsbee Silsbee $0 $4,434,349 $4,434,349 3.42% Silsbee $0 0.00% $4,434,349 1.69"1
Sour Lake Sour Lake $0 53,959,124 $3,459,124 3.05% Sour Lake $0 D.00% $3,959,124 1.51%
Beaumont Beaumont $0 $9,646,471 $9,646,471 7.44% Beaumont $0 0.00% $9,646,471 3.
Unincorporated Unincorporated Unincorporated
Jefferson Coun Jefferson Count ${i $6,537,144 $6,537,144 5.04% Jefferson County $0 0.00% $6,537,144 2.49
Nederland Nederland $0 $4,540,870 $4,540,870 3.50% Nederland $0 0.00% $4,540,870 L73%
Port Arthur Port Arihur Sfl $11,393,392 $11393,392 8.79% Port Arthur $0 0.00% $11,393,392 4.33%
Port Neches Port Neches S9 $3,644,258 53,644,258 2.81% Port Neches $0 O.DO% $3,644,258 1.39%
Bevil Oaks Bevil Oaks SQ $1,351,252 53,351,252 1.04% Bevil Oaks
$0
0.00%
$1,351,252
0.51%
China China $0 $3,108,781 $3 108,781 2.40% China 0 0.00% $3,108,781 1.18%
Name Nome SO $1,738,409 $1,738,409 1.34% Nome $0 0.00% $1,738,409 0.66%
Groves Groves $0 $2,598,441 $2,598,441 2.00% Groves $0 0.00% $2,548,441 0.94%
Brid a City Brid a Ci $0 $3,679,363 $3,679,383 2.84% Brid a Cit $0 O.OD% $3,679,383 1.40%
Oran a Oran a $0 $4,718,736 $4,718,736 3.64% Orange $0 0.00% $4718,736 1.7996
Unincorporated Unincorporated Unincorporated
Oran a County Oran a Coun $0 $12,584,243 $12,584,243 9.70% Oran a Count
$0
0.00%
$12,584,243
4.79%
Pinehurst Pinehurst $0 $3,931,015 $3,931,015 3.03% Pinehurst $0 0.00% $3,931,015 L4
West Oran a West Oran a $0 $4,801,708 $4,801,708 3.70% West Oran a $0 0.00% $4,801,708 l.>!3%
Rose Cit Rose City $0 $4,644,301 54,644,301 3.58% Rose City $0 0-00% $4,644,301 L77%
Victor Victor $0 $5,189,553 $5,189,553 4.00% Victor $0 0.00% $5,189,553 L9
Pine Forest Pine Forest $0 $3,056,286 $3,056,286 236% Pine Forest $0 0.00% $3,056,286 L15
SLTRPC SETRPC $15,000,000 $0 $15,000,000 11.57% SETRPC $133,305,751 100.00% $148,305,751 56
Re tonal Totals: $15,000,000 $114,677,013 $129,677,013 100.00% Re tonal Totals: $133,305,751 100.00% 5262,982.764 100.
Non-Housing Percentage o Total Housing Percentage of Total
AllotaUon: 49.31% Allocation: 50.69%