HomeMy WebLinkAbout(1) JANUARY 17, 2010SUIIDAY, JANUARY 17. 2010
PA to look again at re health insurance fund
By Sherry Koonce
The News staff writer million liability for current and and believes the method emba
k
d
Au
future health care benefits paid for
the benefit of retired city. emplo
- r
e
on very likely is not le al.
A as 60
percen
~
er hearing the concerns of y
ee8, t issue is the amount of money Thrqugh tl
Port Arthur's former -human ~
~ the city is no~v paying toward the fimded heattl
resources manager who retired a issue
$ a $93 million liab lity that C~
s 165 retiredemployees' health "pay as you g
year ago, City Council has agreed
t
i has become an albatross for the e
}~b~
~~ °S~zing .the
o rev
sit the cost., of providing city," Fitzgibbons said d ~
o
-
Past years as accruing for c
insurance to retired em Igyees.
p
In the .process, City Manager • .
Harvey Robinson,. former HR
m premiums rose, the city opted
sometimes against his advice to many of whici
Under new ac
Steve Fitzgibbons said he hopes the anager and assistant city manage
er, told the City Council he w absorb a higher share of rising lished by
city leaders will focus on the big pic-
tore - how best to decrease a $93 as con-
cerned with the way the city, is
' employee health care ..premiums,
Over time, the city went frame a -
P Accounting St
ernments are
0
g ing about decreasing the liability y
ing roughly 50 percent to
h
as muc See
PA
Continued from Al
coats for retiree benefits,.
including future health care
expenditures and those from
previous years. Cities not
complying would risk losing
a favorable bond rating.
In recent months the city
has hired a consulting firm
to look at ways the city could
reduce the unfunded health
burden.
In September, the City
Council approved changes to
the way employee health
care premiums are paid.
Based on the recommends-
tion of the consultants and
the Texas Municipal League,
the City Council opted to
unblend health insurance
premiums paid by current
and retiree employees. ana
to pass a higher sharp ~ °~.he
premium payment to retired
employees who have their
families insured. The shift
will save the city an estimat-
ed 27 percent on the project-
ed liability, and allow the
city to move back closer to
the 50 percent share it once
paid.
Because retirees' typically
are considered a higher risk
to insure, their premiums
have gone up as a result a
disapportionment amount,
Robinson said.
Rate increases associated
with the unblending process
are to be implemented over
a five-year period -the
first during 2010.
"The unblending of the
plans will affect tremen-
dourly the health insurance
costs for retirees," Robinson
said.
In November, Robinson
said premiums for medical
insurance for he and his wife
increased by $77, from $646
a month to $723.
"And, that's just the first
increase," he said.
The amount each retiree
pays is different, depending
on whether their family is
insured and whether they
have reached the age of 65
when they become eligible
for Medicare.
Robinson said he is not
surprised ~ at the unfunded
health care liability owed by
the city.. In fact, he said he
cautioned the city on numer-
ous occasions against
absorbing the coats.
Robinson said the costs
absorbed by ,the -city while
employees were working
became part of their benefit
package, earned while they
worked. To pay less on the
premiums now and charge
more to the retiree is much
like decreasing someone's
pension after they have
retired.
`t'he city cannot unitarily
go and in and reduce the
contribution rate. The bene-
fit they are paying is an
earned benefit. This is the
benefit that was available
when I retired, and you can-
not go back. and change it
now," he said.
Fitzgibbons said both the
unblending and passing an
iwc~reased share of the cost of
health insurance on to the
retired employees is within
the framework of the law
Last year the city hired
A.R. Panzera, a consulting
firm that specializes in
employee benefits, and is
one of the best in the state,
Fitzgibbons said.
"The: benefits. attorney
feels we are on solid legal
ground for what we have
done to address this prob-
lem," )~tzgibbons said.
The city's liability is about
five or -six times larger than
other cities in the state. The
liability per capita, would
cost each Port Arthur resi-
dent $1,600, Fitzgibbons
said.
At Tuesday's City Council
meeting, Bob Williamson,
.District 6 councilman, said
he was willing to look at the
method of unblending pre-
miums again -especially
since it was not meant to be
a solution to the $93 million
liability.
`What we did was buy
time. The unblending was
done first to give s time, we
had to do something quick,"
Williamson said. "What
we've done though is put
about $100 burden on
retirees and that is un#'ortu-
nate. I don't think our
retirees should be unblend-
ed."
The city council has
agreed to consider the issue
in a yet-to-be-scheduled
work session. At the city's
request, Robinson said he
was willing to attend the
session and be part of the
process.
skoonces~panews. tom