Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPR13335: INDUSTRIAL PARK - MO ME OFFICE TO: Mayor, City Council & City Manage~.~ ~/ From: Mark T. sokolow, City Attorney I~-'' subject: p. R. No. 13335 Updated Council Meeting December 6, 2005 Date: December 2, 2005 Attached is P.R. No. 13335 a resolution as it pertains to the industrial Park Covenants and Restrictions at the spur 93 Business Park, Master Plan and Lot Configuration. This resolution was tabled at the previouS meeting and the changes made are highlighted- The changes include the attachment of the Master Plan, attaching updated deed restrictions, and also making changes in the lot configurations in the Master Plan. MTS/gt Attachment cc: VIA FACSI~!?J~ (409) 835-211~ Kate McGlynn VIA FACSIMILE (409) 962-444~ ~loyd Batiste EDC CEO z, pr 13335_updated .memo P. R. No. 13335 12/2/05 gt UPDATED RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AS IT pERTAINS TO THE INDUSTRIAL PARK coVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS AT THE SPUR 93 BusINESS pARK, MASTER pLAN AND LOT CONFIGURATION WHEREAS, the City of Port Arthur Section 4A Economic Development Corporation plans to develop the Spur 93 Business Park. WHEREAS, the City of Port Arthur Section 4A Economic Development Corporation has approved the Master Plan which is to serve only as a guide to the development of the Business Park, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit ~A". WHEREAS, the City of Port Arthur Section 4A Economic Development corporation Board has approved the change in the planned lot configurations as delineated in Exhibit ~B" wherein Triangle Waste can be located on the 10 acre site la and Reliable Polymer Services can be located on the 10 acre site lb. WHEREAS, the City of Port Arthur Section 4A Economic Development Corporation has approved the covenants and restrictions attached as Exhibit ~C". NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PORT ARTHUR: z.pr13335_updated section 1. That the facts and opinions in the preamble are true and correct. Section 2. That the City Council approves the Master Plan in substantially the same form as described in Exhibit "A" with the change in proposed acreage per lot and in the number of lots in Tract i as delineated in Exhibit '~B" so that Triangle Waste can be located on the 10 acre site la and Reliable Polymer Services can be located on the 10 acre site lb, as illustrated in Exhibit "B-I". Section 3. That the City Council approves the industrial Park covenantS and restrictions in substantially the same form as described in Exhibit "C". Section 4. That a copy of this caption be spread upon the Minutes of the City Council. READ, ADOPTED AND APPROVED on this __ day of , A.D., 2005, at a Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Port Arthur, Texas, by the following vote: AYES: Mayor , Council Members , NOES: oSCAR ORTIZ, MAYOR ATTEST: EVANGELINE GREEN, CITY SECRETARY z.pr13335_updated APPROVED AS TO FOP/~: MARK T. SOKOLOW, CITY ATTORNEY A~PROVED FOR ADMINISTRATION: STEPHEN FITZGIBBONS, CITY MANAGER z.pr13335_updated EXHIBIT "A" .' rk for Port Arthur Texas New Business Pa ......... ., ...~ ~'v., Cou.cii to Complete Purchnse of £=nd and Proceed Request for.4pprovatsrom ~v~ ~ou, # ,. ..... / with Design Phase of Project Port Arthur Economic Development Corporation February 13, 2001 Thc following summarizes the status of the subject project. COMMITMENT PHASE Based upon authorization by the EDC Board and City Council, the project moved into thc current phase to validate thc assumptions of the Feasibility Phase, complete due diligence on the site, select a Project Engineering team, complete a Master Plan, and confu-m Budgets and Schedules prior te commit'ting to development of the project. Due Diligence Environmental - Phase 1, Phase 2- Complete -No issues found Wetlands Issues - Received Corps of Engineer's conftrmation of N'RCS ruling that excludes site from wetland regulations Site Survey - Boundary- Complete Topographic - Complete Final Document - Incorporating drill site location Title - Title Policy - Preliminary commitment received Pipelines - Located Un-documented Pipeline Abandonment in progress Other minor issues Resolved Project Engineer An Engineering firm was required to assist in completion of Master Plan (previously approved by EDC Board and City Council and fees included in Budget for Commitment Phase). An Engineering Cum is required for design, bid and award, and construction related services for development of Business Park. (agreement to be approved by EDC Board and City Council) Engineering Selection Criteria 1.0 Project Organization (finn or combined team) - 15% This criterion addresses the organization and overall capacity of',he project engineering i'um or team proposed for the project. 1.1 Su'ucture of team (20%) (simplicity and logic of team organization) 1.2 Capability of prime i'mn (20%) (size, specialization in similar work) 1.3 Management, planning and design leadership assigned to the project (25%) (resumes, references and interview) Staff resources available for project (25%) (l~4umbers of qualified personnel in the specific disciplines requirad for project) 1.5 Production Technology (10%) (workstations, hardware and software) 1 of 7 2.0 Experience and Reputation (emphasis on lead frrm, ifa team) - 30% This criterion addresses the track record of the proposed f'mu or team with specific emphasis on the primary fn-m, if a team. 2.1 Previous experience with planning and design of business or indusuial parks (20%) (type, size and quality of work) 2.2 Previous experience with planning and design of municipal infrastructure systems (20%) (type, size and quality of work) 2.3 Reputation for responsive service (20 (as determined from references) 2.4 Reputation for meeting schedules (20%) (as determined from references) 2.5 Reputation for meeting construction cost budgets (20%) (as detem~ned from references) 3.0 Technical Proposal (emphasis of interview)- 35% This criterion addresses the responsiveness of the fn'm or team's proposal to the specific issues and opportunities of the project. This criteria will be utilized to evaluate the "short list" teams or firms only. 3.1 Demonstrated understanding of the project (15%) (from wriRen proposal and interview) 3.2 Proposed work plan (30%) (tasks, sequence, and deliverables) 3.3 Quality control process during design and conslruction (15%) (plan backed with track record) 3.4 Cost control process (25%) (plan backed with track record) 3.5 Project schedule (15%) (milestones and completion dates backed by track record) 4.0 Local and Minority Participation - 20% This criterion addresses the quality and extent of participation in the team by local and rainority businesses. 4.1 Port Arthur Business (30%) (percentage of work to be accomplished by firms with offices in Port Arthur) 4.2 Jefferson County Business (20%) (percentage of work to be accomplished by firms with offices in Jefferson County) 4.3 Minority and Disadvantaged Business (50 %) (percentage of work to be accomplished by such businesses) Engineering Selection Process The following summarizes the selectaon process implemented m the selection and recommendation of an engineering team to serve the project. Project broadly advertised Twenty-five Request for Proposal packages sent 2 of 7 Eight submissions received Four fu'ms on short list Based upon the above criteria Schamburg & Polk in association with ESPA Corp. was selected to assist in completion of the master plan, provide estimates for site and infrastructure construction costs, and to submit a proposal to act as Project Engineer for Design and Conslroction of the project. The team is constituted as follows: Prime consultant (50% of work) Schamburg & Polk, Beaumont Texas Design of Utility Systems Bob Shaw, Port Arthur, Texas Design of li~ station ESPA Corp., Houston, Texas Assoc. Consultant (50% of work) (certified minority fuma) Design of Streets and Drainage Wong & Associates, Houston, Texas Landscape Architecture (certified minority fu'm) Proposed Engineering Contract A proposed engineering contract is attached for approval. It is based upon the City of Port Arthur's standard agreement forms It contains a clause requiring the Project Engineer to complete a design within the established budget. (see Cost and Budget Summary at*ached) It include the following fee mounts Design Phase Services $360,000 Construction Phase Services $103,140 It will require a further authorization by the EDC Board and Council at the beginning of the construction phase for Construction Phase Services. Master Plan Attached are maps depicting the proposed Master Plan for the subject project. The following summarizes the Master Plan Two Stages of Development Ultimate extension of Jade Ave Extension of Utilities Stage I 136 net acres 163 gross usable acres Ultimate Develop 238 net acres 284 gross usable acres 83.6% net to gross Programmed Area 208 net acres 300 acres 70 % net to gross Additional Area 30 net acres 3 of 7 Budget The attached are charts summarizing the budget and cost status of the project. The following amounts represent the current estimate of outlays required for the development of the Business Park. Completed Proposed Total Project Feasibility Phase $85,450 Commitment Phase $199,760 Land Purchase $1,236,803 Design Phase $578,600 Construction Phase $5,219,850 Business Park Totals $285,210 $7,035,220 $7~320,430 Water line extension down Jade $345,000 $345,000 (plus upsize of on site lines) Additional water system contribution requested $400,000 $400,000 Additional Offsite Utilities $745,000 $745,000 PROJECT TOTALS $7,380,220 $7,665,430 (includes Jade Ave. portion only) GRAND TOTAL (includes add. water sys. contribO $7,780,000 $8,065,430 The additional offsite utility costs above are for improvements to the water system that serves the site. The amount shown represents the requested contribution from to a City system project needed to insure adequate pressure to the Business Park site and other areas in the vicinity. It is assumed that $345,000 (water line extensions down Jade Ave., and up sizing of lines through the park) will be included within the construction contracts for the Business Park. Schedule Attached is a schedule chart showing the major milestones and estimating durations for the completion of the project. Design Phase (includes bidding of project) 9-10 months Award (projected date) Nov 2001 Construction Phase 12 months Completion (projected date) Nov 2002 Funding and Financing The Economic Development Corporation has approximately $7 million in cash reserves. During this phase the use of cash, bonds or conventional £mancing was discussed. In the process a cash flow analysis and estimate of EDC funds during the development was prepared. The attached graphs the cash flow and total cost investment requked to complete the project 4 of 7 The following cha~s comp~e ~ iml~ct of two b~sic nllernatives for funding the development of thc park. In beth cases costs for the cen~nued operation of the EDC have been deducted. The costs of the additional off- site ~tcr service imptovcmenls are not included. No additional income has ~ assumed (in spite of increases that will result from development of Wninmrt and Lowe's) and no revenue ~om land sales is assumed (even Otough suc~ sales mey occur before devclopmen~ is complete). At the conclusion of the project (apart f~om the impact of additional projects) reserves will increase at a rate of npproxinmtely $ l.$1Vl~ per year. In addition land sales should hc ex~'cted to return the to~ul amount inveslgd In thc development of the business park over a ten year period (financing the cost of hilu~ phases in thc process), while at the ~ame time accommodating appmxinmtely 3500 jobs in Port Arthur with an annual economic impact of nearly $3001VlM. Total EDC Reserves ($MM) for Years 2001, 2002 If Business Park is Developed wiUI Cash 7.00 6,00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 The firsl approach Io funding (abeve) assumes that the project will be developed from cash reserves. 5 of 7 Total EDC Reserves ($MM) for Years 2001, 2002 It' Business Park ts Partially Financed with $4.5 MM in Bonds 7,00 6.00 5.00 3.00 2.00 1.00. 0,00 Thc second approach to funding (above) assumes ilmt approximately 4.5 million dollars in bonds will bc sold to finance thc project. Ineaning this amount of debt will allow thc EDC to return its rese~c balance to approximately the lex, el that existed before thc purchase of the site. The amount thus funded also may be eligible for Tax Increment financing (see below). At thc conclusion of the prq.~ect the EDC will have a continuing debt sotvice obligation of nearly $600,000 per year for approxinmtcly 9 years. With the probable need to aSSist in water systems improvements to serve the noflhcrn sector of Port A~hur and discussions of other major pl'ojects for the ha'lance of the City it ma)' be prudent to consider using debt (in the form ofbonds) to fund a portion ofthe project. EDA Grant With the project now defined it is time to assess thc possibility of ob .laming an EDA granC Thc data needed to proceed is now available as a by-product oftha work completed on the pwject to date. While such funds should not be relied upon, lite City and the EDC should cvaloate thc possibility of offsetting any eligible costs related to project dex, elopment via such a grant. Tax Increment Financing District In addition the possibility of establishing a tax increment development disttict has been raised. This project appears to fit the profile of Texas law regarding such distdcls. Once established increasos in prope~y taxes that result from increased value are dedicated to offsetting the cost of thc development (infrastrectmc, cie.) that has ecCmTed in the designated development arco. The cslabiishmenl ofa TIF district is an involved process xvith additional costs assecinted with set up and opexation. Final determination as to thc wbethar to utilize this mechanism must be made upon further investigation. As with ED^ grants, this significant aid to funding the project (om'enily cstinmted at approxinmtely $4.5mm) should not be assumed until it is actually realized. But the City and thc EDC should clearly proceed w~th futthar assessment of thc eligibility for, and desimliility of, devaloping thc BusineSS Park within a TIF district. 6of7 Approval to Proceed /his summa-,7 is submitted to the EDC Board and City Council to seek approval to proceed with the project. The following actions are proposed for your concurrence: 1. Complete purchase of the Site $1,236,803 2. Engage Schaumburg & Polk / ESPA Corp as Project Engineer $360,000 (Design Phase) $103,140 (Construction Phase if further authorized) 3. Engage Diamond Consulting / Beach P, amirez as Project Manage $140,970 (Design Phase) $78,540 (Construction Phase if further authorized) 4. Incur other project related expenses during Design Phase $77,000 5. Approve Master Plan 6. Approve Total Project Budget (subject to further authorization) $7,665,430 7. Approve Additional Offsite Utilities Contribution $400,000 (water system Improvements) 8. Approve plan to issue $4.5MM ia bonds (subject to advise from bond council) and to investigate establishment of a TIF dis~ct to include the Business Park. 9. Approve plan to seek an EDA grant for eligible portions of the project. 7 of 7 EXHIBIT "B" TO RESOLUTION CHANGE IN TRACT ONE LOT CONFIGURATIONS PRESENTLY IEXHIBIT ~B-I"): Lot 15 - 5 acres Lot 3 - 3 acres Lot 6 - 3 acres Lot 4 - 5 acres Lot 5 - 7 acres Lot 9 9 acres CHANGED TO (EXHIBIT UB-2"): Lot iA 10 acres (Adjacent to proposed Jade Extension) Lot lB - 10 acres Lot lC - 8 acres Lot iD - 8 acres (Adjacent to West Port Arthur Road) z.pr13335_updated EXHIBIT "C" Pra!imi=a.~' Draf: (!!/! 6/95; COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS PORT ARTHUR BUSINESS PARK Updated (Note from Drafter: The following is an updatedF~!~m~na:'y draft of proposed Covenants and Restrictions as approved by the Port Arthur Eennomic Development Corporation Board of Dkectors and as reviewed by PAEDC's attorney and by the City Attorney). -r~:~ ~: .... ~+ ,~ c,~ GENERAL The City of Port Arthur Section 4A Economic Development Corporation (PAEDC) is the owner of the Port Arthur Business Park (Business Park). PAEDC has determined that it is in the best interests of the City of Port Arthur, PAEDC, the Business Park and its future occupants to adopt the following provisions restrictions and covenants to control the development within the business park. CONDITIONS OF SALE Each parcel sold or conveyed to a user by PAEDC is for the purpose of development of facilities and occupancy by a user. Development of facilities (buildings) for user occupancy must be completedbc~n within eighteen months of purchase. If there is an incentive agreement with the PAEDC, the construction must be completed within the timetables of the incentive agreement. If construction has not ec, mmenced been completed in the period specified, PAEDC shall have the option to repurchase the property on the basis of reversing (or rescinding) the terms of the original sale, including price. This option may be exercised at any time subsequent to the failure of of construction to ata~ be completed by the specified date. Exercise of the option will be by formal action of the PAEDC Board. Delivery of written notice of exercise of this option shall be the cause of an immediate halt to actions to develop the parcel by the parcel owner. If the owner or lessee of property in the Business Park wishes to sell or assign the property to a third party, the owner or lessee shall obtain the approval of the PAEDC Board of Directors, with such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. The owner or lessee shall present information as to the financial and credit information as to the new buyer or assignee and such other information as reasonably requested by the PAEDC Chief Executive Officer (CEO). The new owner or lessee shall be required to assume the obligations in the incentive agreement, with such changes as are approved by the PAEDC Board of Directors. Page 1 of 15 If the owner or lessee wishes to subdivide and sell or assign only a portion of its property to a third party, the owner or lessee shall obtain the approval of the PAEDC Board of Directors which can deny the request at its discretion. At the discretion of the PAEDC, the PAEDC shall have a first option to repurchase said undeveloped portion for the same cost as delineated in the incentive agreement or sales agreement and in such additional reasonable amounts as to reimburse the owner for monies that he has expended in maintaining said portion of the property. In such case, PAEDC shall have 90 days to notify the owner of its decision in regard to this option. LEGAL DESCRIPTION The Port Arthur Business Park includes all land as described in Appendix A, and on such other property as approved by PAEDC. TERMS AND DEFINITIONS For the purposes of these covenants and restrictions, certain terms, phrases, words and their derivatives shall have their meaning as specified in this section. Where terms are not defined, they shall have their ordinary accepted meanings within the context with which they are used. Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary, Copyright 1987, shall be considered as providing ordinary accepted meaning. (1) Board. City of Port Arthur Section 4A Economic Development Corporation Board of Directors. (2) Building. Any structure built for the support, shelter and enclosure of persons, animals, chattels or movable property of any kind. When subdivided in a manner sufficient to prevent the spread of fire, each portion so subdivided may be deemed a separate building. (3) City council. The governing and legislative body of the City of Port Arthur. (4) Distn'ct. A section of the City of Port Arthur for which the regulations governing the height, area or use of the land and buildings are uniform. (5) Height. The vertical distance of a building measured from the average established grade at the street line or from the average natural front yard ground level, whichever is higher, to (1) the highest point of the roofs surface if a flat surface; (2) to the deck line of mansard roofs; or (3) to the mean height level between eaves and ridge for hip and gable roofs, and, in any event, excluding chimneys, cooling towers, elevator bulkheads, penthouses, tanks, water towers, radio towers, ornamental cupolas, domes or spires and parapet walls not exceeding ten feet in height. If the street grade has not been officially established, the average front yard shall be used for a base level. Page 2 of 15 (6) Lot. Land occupied or to be occupied by a building and its accessory buildings, and including such open spaces as are required under these covenants and restrictions and having its principal tiontage upon a public street or officially approved place. (7) Occupancy. The use or intended use of the land or buildings by proprietors or tenants. (8) Planning and zoning commission. The agency designated in the City Charter as the planning commission and appointed by the city council as an advisory body to it and which is authorized to recommend changes in the zoning ordinance. (9) Parking lot or structure, commercial (motor vehicle). An area or structure devoted to the parking or storage of motor vehicles. May include, in the case of a parking structure only, a facility for servicing of motor vehicles provided such facility is primarily an internal function for use only by motor vehicles occupying the structure and creates no special problems of ingress or egress. (10) Structure. Any structure built for the support, shelter and enclosure of persons, animals, chattels or movable property of any kind. When subdivided in a manner sufficient to prevent the spread of fire, each portion so subdivided may be deemed a separate building. (11) Yard. An open space other than a court, on the lot in which a building is situated and which is not obstructed from a point 30 inches above the general ground level of the graded lot to the sky, except as provided for roof overhang and similar features and for the usual trees and landscape planting. (12) Yard, front. An open, unoccupied space on a lot facing a street extending across the front of the lot between the side lot lines and from the front face of the building to the front lot or street line with the minimum horizontal distance between the street line and the main building line as specified for the district in which it is located. The front face of the building shall not necessarily be determined by the primary access to the building or any unit therein. (13) Yard, rear. An open, unoccupied space, except for permitted detached accessory buildings, trees and planting, extending across the rear of a lot from one side lot line to the other side lot line and having a depth between the building and the rear lot line. (14) Yard, side. An open, unoccupied space or spaces on one or two sides of a main building situated between the building and a side line of the lot and extending through from the front yard to the rear yard. Any lot line not the rear line or a front line shall be deemed a side line. REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF USES AND IMPROVEMENTS All uses that occupy parcels and all facilities and improvements constructed in the park (including all alterations and additions to the site and such facilities and improvements) shall be subject to approval by PAEDC and may require approval by the City of Port Arthur. PAEDC and the City may at their sole discretion involve other parties in the review of proposed uses and improvements. In cases where specialized evaluations are deemed necessary, PAEDC may require a fee to cover the cost of the services of consultants engaged to perform these evaluations. No construction may be initiated upon any parcel in the Business Park until approval has been granted by PAEDC (and where required, by the City of Port Arthur). Failure of the user of a parcel to seek approval for development plans in a timely manner will not be the basis for granting an extension as to the timetable for in '~-- ^:-~'~ ....... u ~^.~^~ ~ ..... ~ _.~ to *~.~ ~'~-:~-~,,~,~,~ of ,construction. Approval means formal action by the PAEDC Board, (and where required by City Council of the City of Port Arthur) and the receipt of written Page 3 of 15 confirmation of approval from a competent authority of these bodies. Application for approval shall be made in writing and must contain all submission requirements specified by PAEDC. Such requirements will include site plans, building plans and specifications, and other such information as PAEDC and the City may request. Page 4 of 15 PERMITTED OCCUPANCIES Sites and facilities within the Business Park may be occupied by the uses specified in the following chart (Parcels are as designated on the Business Park Final ---Parcels 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 & 9 E, C, E & F Office, warehouse, distribution, light fabrication and -assembly, recycling, manufacturing and other approved usesand Parcel 4 & 8 ~ - Office and other approved r~rc. ...... Parcel 6, 10 - Warehouse, distribution, manufacturing, assembly and other approved Other .............. ~r .......... uses may be approved by PAEDC at its sole discretion which includes career centers and other types of development as approved by the PAEDC and as authorized by State Law. : All occupancies permitted may be subject to additional restrictions imposed as a result of review of user applications provided that such specific requirements are intended to implement the restrictions previously established by the PAEDC in these Covenants and Restrictions or subsequent amendments. PROHIBITED OCCUPANCIES Specifically prohibited uses include manufacturing and process operations that transmit noise, or release odors, fumes or dust that materially exceed City, State, or Federal Standards or discharge a waste stream that is not acceptable (due to content or volume) for the City's sa~tary sewer system. Any use that requires on-site treatment of waste in order to meet the above requirements will be allowed only on the basis ora special use pcmnit from PA~DC, and the City of Port Arthur, the TCEQ or the applicable regulatory agency. In general, on site ~reatment of significant quantities of special waste will not be p~mitted. A special use permit may, at the sole discretion of PAEDC, be granted, conditional upon continued and demonstrative conformance to specific requirements and standards. Failure by the nser receiving such conditional approval to strictly conform to the requirements and standards imposed will be the basis of termination of the special use permit, without recourse by the user. Notice of termination of ~. apcc2:.! ::~cany permit required by any regulatory agency (including the City) will require the user to immediately cease all on-site processes that generate or contribute to the subject waste stream. In addition, all exterior site uses including parking areas, truck manenvering and docking areas, storage and equipment yards and the like will be developed and maintained in strict conformance with these covenants and restrictions and with the specific terms of approvals ~anted by PAEDC and the City of Port Arthur. Page 5 of 15 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS~ CODES AND ORDINANCES All improvements constructed in thc Business Park shall meet or exceed the standards and ordinances of the City of Port Arthur, State of Texas statutes and regulations, and national standards. It shall be the duty of the user of any parcel in the Business Park to conform to such requirements and to obtain all approvals and permits granted by governing authorities. Such requirements include but are not limited to City Building Permits; and local drainage, environmental and utility requirements. Review and approval by PAEDC and the City of Port Arthur under the above provisions for Review and Approval of Uses and Improvements does not relieve or mitigate in any way this separate duty of the user. The owners or lessees of the property shall take such precautions as to commence and complete the improvements wherein laborers, subcontractors and contractors are promptly paid with no materials and mechanic's liens being filed on the property. Prior to commencing construction, the owner or lessee shall provide to the PAEDC such evidence of financial ability to complete the project, which may include letters of credit, and contractor's performance bonds and payment bonds. PROPERTY MAINTENANCE Owners and Users of parcels and improvements shall perform regular and routine maintenance on these properties. Undeveloped parcels shall be kept mowed and free of debris. Developed parcels (including site and facilities) shall be maintained in a manner consistent with the users' approved proposal for use and improvements. Lawns and landscaping shall be kept free of overgrowth, trash and debris. Parking or storage of vehicles, equipment or materials in areas other than approved outdoor storage is prohibited, th~ved-aAreas shall be maintained free of trash, sediment, debris, and abandoned or Outdoor storage areas other than those approved by PAEDC are prohibited. Approved outdoor storage areas shall be well maintained and shall be kept neat and orderly in appearance. Only materials and equipment that are in active use at the site may be stored on site. Storage of derelict or junked materials, equipment or vehicles on-site is prohibited. Buildings and other structures shall be kept in an attractive condition. Exterior surfaces shall be washed and painted as required to maintain a fresh appearance. Exterior materials that deteriorate shall be replaced. No open burning of rubbish is permitted on the site. All waste material shall be confined to trash receptacles in approved and screened locations for removal from the site. In case of fire or damage from other causes, the owner or lessee shall restore the improvements within nine (9) months unless granted an extension by PAEDC. Page 6 of 15 INSURANCE The lot owners and lessees shall maintain casualty insurance in an amount sufficient to replace the bnildings. A copy of the certificate of insurance shall be given to the PAEDC and the PAEDC shall be listed as an additional insured. If the lot owner or lessee fails to maintain or pay for the insurance, the PAEDC (in its sole discretion) may pay for the costs thereof, assess the lot owners and lessees, and file liens. ASSESSMENT The lessees and private owners of the land in the Business Park shall pay assessments to the PAEDC for the maintenance of the street signage and landscaping, the costs to enfome these deed restrictions, and the costs to maintain business park, such assessments shall be a minimum of $200 per acre per year and shall be payable on or before December 31st of each year. Additional assessments, as determined by the PAEDC Board of Directors shall not exceed the actual proportionate share of the expenditures made by the PAEDC plus a 10% administrative fee. The proportionate share shall be the number of acres owned or leased divided by 246. CONTINUATIONS~ P. EV!S!ON AMENDMENT AND VARIATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS These covenants and restrictions shall remain in force on all parcels and shall be binding on all current and future owners and lessees of parcels within the Business Park. Variation in these covenants and restrictions is limited to one of the following methods: PAEDC (subject to the approval of and the City of Port Arthur) may from time to time r-~.qse-amend the provisions, covenants and restrictions *~'-*,,.~, ':511, -t-},,:~--~" *~,,- parcel: that PAEDC,~.~ +~., '~;*"~.~ ~ ...... ~thur may in its sole discretion grant variances to these provisions, covenants and rcstrictiuns as a part of the approval of thc Review and Approval of Usc and Improvement process. Such variances must be requested in ~dtin~ by thc user of the parcel ' ' ' . PAEDC will notify all ¢,*~5¢r adjacent parcel owners of~ the request for variation by posting such notice and ~vi]l receive and consider comments from such parcel owners in evaluating such variances. It is the intent of PAEDC to maintain the general character and intent of the provisions, covenants and restrictions and to comply with Article $190.6 V.T.C.Aanfi to, ..... ;'~ ..... ~*; .... '-, Page 7 of 15 SITE DEVELOPMENT Building sites of individual users must be planned to have an attractive image and must be well maintained. The following requirements shall apply to thc development of sites within the Business Park: Set Backs ! Building Street Frontage 45 feet Side and rear lot lines 15 feet Paving Street Frontage 20 feet Side and rear lot lines No requirement Landscaping All non paved areas Maintained lawns Street Frontage 1 tree per 100 feet of frontage - 2 inch caliper Paving Parking I Automobile Concrete Tracks and Trailers Concrete Aprons and maneuvering areas Concrete Access and Entry As approved by PAEDC May not conflict with street traffic or access to adjacent sites. Utilities All connections and service underground and; Equipment (transformers etc.) screened from public view Outdoor Not allowed forward of the line of the building face Yards and Fully screened from frontage with berms, planting or Storage walls constructed in conformance with standards for Ares front face of buildings .......... No larger than the area of the building Area Parcels 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, x~ Limitations Parcels 4, 8E, "'v, ~ ~ ,er Not penmtted Parcel 6, 1~ No limitNe-t-pem4~-ed Fencing Side and rear yards only Visible from Street Decorative iron or as approved by PAEDC (no wood fences permitted) Side and rear Chain link or as approved by PAEDC (no wood fences permitted) Ancillary Structures and Equipment Constructed to meet applicable building standards Page 8 of 15 Tanks, trash receptacles and other equipment screened from public view Mail boxes as approved by PAEDC Flagpoles as approved by PAEDC Lighting Pole or building mounted lighting All lighting will be natural in color (no uncorrected high pressure sodium fixtures) Lighting must be controlled to prevent glare as seen i'om adjacent public ways and adjacent properties Page 9 of 15 Drainage Surface drainage must be controlled within site boundaries. Discharge into drainage ways as approved by responsible authorities. Signage All signs must be approved by PAEDC May be internally or externally illuminated May not be animated Site Mounted Signs Maximum of 6 feet in height Base no more than 2 feet above ~¢-ound No closer then 10 feet to property line Compatible with building color and materials Integrated and compatible with landscaping Building Mounted Signs Not painted on building May not extend beyond building profile Must be compatible is size, color and material with building BUILDING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION Building design including all exterior materials and colors must be attractive, compatible with adjacent development and be approved by the PAEDC. Category Renuirements Exterior Materials Except for trim and accents, no wood will be permitted Walls Facing Frontage and Public Ways Concrete or masonry Walls Facing Side and Parcel 1, 2, 3, Concrete, masonry, or metal panels Rem Yards 5, 6, 7, 9, 10A, ~, C, E Parcel 4, 8g~ Concrete or masonry Roofing Materials Any roof surface that is exposed to public view must be approved by PAEDC Rooftop equipment No more than five feet in height and screened fi.om public view Awnings and Canopies Compatible with building design and approved by PAEDC Exterior Colors Exterior surfaces will be predominately neutral or natural colors. Bright accent or trim colors will be considered by the PAEDC. Page 10 of 15 ENFORCEMENT OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS Determination regarding the meaning, an~ applicability and enforcement of these covenants and restrictions is the sole domain of PAEDC a~ :'t: agcntgBoard of Directors. Inquiry in regard to such matters shall be made to PAEDC in writing. A ~etennination rendered in writing by PAEDC Board of Directors shall be deemed final and binding on all parties. Enforcement of the provisions, covenants and restrictions shall be in accordance with law or through civil or criminal proceedings initiated by PAEDC or by the City of Port Arthur, tke r~.., ^r D^.~ ^ .-~- ..... ~ ............... ~ ...:~u:~ ~u~ r,.,~: .... D~t. Enforcement action may include but is not limited to restraint of violations, a::~.v.r recovery of costs, attorneys fees and damages, assessments, fines, civil penalties, foreclosure, and judicial sale. Page 11 of 15 APPENDIX "A" DESCRIPTION OF A 297.960 ACRE TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND OUT OF AND PART OF THE WM. McFADDIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 416, THE T. & N.O.R.R. SURVEY, SECTION NO. 5, ABSTRACT NO. 238, AND THE T. & N.O.R.R. SURVEY, SECTION NO. 9, ABSTRACT NO. 242 JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS AUGUST 20, 2001 All that certain tract or parcel of land lying and being situated in Jefferson County, Texas, parts of the WM. McFADDIN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 416, the T. & N.O.R.R. SURVEY, SECTION NO. 5, ABSTRACT NO. 238, and the T. & N.O.R.R. SURVEY, SECTION NO. 9, ABSTRACT NO. 242, and being parts of Blocks 14, 15 and 16, Range N, Blocks 14, 15 and 16, Range O, and Blocks 15 and 16, Range P of the Lands of the Port Arthur Land Co., the plat of which said subdivision is of record in Volume 1, Page 22 of the Map Records of Jefferson County, Texas, and being a part of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "McFaddin and Cordts" tract, which said McFaddin and Cordts tract is designated 'q'RACT NO. 18-C" and is described in that certain instrument from W.P.H. McFaddin, Jr., and J.L.C. McFaddin, as Trustees of the McFaddin Trust to J.L.C. McFaddin, Di McFaddin Houk, Perry McFaddin Duncan, W.P.H. McFaddin Jr., Mamie McFaddin Ward, Camelia B. McFaddin and Di Vernon McFaddin Cordts, W.P.H. McFaddin Jr., and J.LC. McFaddin, jointly, and Mamie McFaddin Ward, W.P.H. McFaddin, Jr., J.L.C. McFaddin, and Camelia B. McFaddin and Di Vemon McFaddin Cordts, jointly, dated February 26, 1948 and recorded in Volume 692, Page 22 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County, Texas, and which said TRACT NO. 18-C is indicated on that certain plat entitled "PARTITION MAP NO. 3 OF THE McFADDIN TRUST PROPERTY IN JEFFERSON COUNTY, TEXAS ... "which said plat is of record in Volume 8, Page 110 of the Map Records of Jefferson County, Texas, and being a part of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "Cordts" tract, which said Cordts tract is described in that certain instrument from E.G. Cordts, Jr., Independent Executor of the Estate of Di Vernon McFaddin Bedy to E.G. Cordts, Jr., Colleen Clave Cordts and Anna Camelia Cordts, dated September 13, 1994 and recorded under County Clerk's File No. 949432523 of the Official Public Records of Real Property of Jefferson County, Texas, and the said tract herein described being that exact same certain tract of land herein referred to as the "PAEDC" tract, which said PAEDC tract is described in that certain instrument from E.G. Cordts, Jr. ..... Colleen Clare Cordts Rice .... , and Anna Camelia Cordts Edwardson .... to Port Arthur Economic Development Corporation, dated February 28, 2001 and recorded under County Clerk's File No. 2001007554 of the Official Public Records of Real Property of Jefferson County, Texas, and the said tract herein described being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a iron rod with a Texas Department of Transportation aluminum cap (TxDOT Type 1 Monument) found for the southeast comer of the said tract herein Page 12of15 described, the said comer being the southeast comer of the said PAEDC tract; and the said comer also being the most southerly southwest comer of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "Parcel 31" tract, which said Parcel 31 tract is so designated and is described in that certain instrument from E.G. Cordts, Jr., Colleen Clare Cordts Rice and Anna Camelia Cordts Edwardson to Jefferson County, dated March 15, 1999 and recorded under County Clerk's File No. 1999009190 of the Official Public Records of Real Property of Jefferson County, Texas, and the said comer being in the north line of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "Parcel 32" tract, which said Parcel 32 tract is so designated and is described in that certain instrument from The Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation to Jefferson County, dated December 12, 1996 and recorded under County Clerk's File No. 96-9638512 of the Official Public Records of Real Property of Jefferson County, Texas, the said comer being an intedor angle point comer in the southwesterly right-of-way line of Texas State Highway Spur 93, and the said TxDOT Type 1 Monument found for comer being East (Assumed Basis of Beadngs - called South 89° 37' 00" East) along and with the south line of the said PAEDC tract, said north line of the Parcel 32 tract and north line of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the '~Nard" tract, which said Ward tract is designated "TRACT NO. 19-C" and is described in the hereinbefore referenced instrument recorded in Volume 692, Page 22 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County, Texas, and which said TRACT NO. 19-C is indicated on the hereinbefore referenced plat of record in Volume 8, Page 110 of the Map Records of Jefferson County, Texas, a total distance of 5,430.99 feet (called 5,431.07 feet) from a 5/8" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "RPLS 3636" found for reference; THENCE West (called North 89° 37' 00" West) along and with the said south line of the PAEDC tract, north line of the Parcel 32 tract and north line of the Ward tract, passing at a distance of 16.92 feet (called 16.92 feet) a 5/8" iron rod found for the most northerly northwest comer of the said Parcel 32 tract, the said comer being an extedor angle point comer in the said southwesterly right-of-way line of Texas State Highway Spur 93, and passing at a distance of 4,938.57 feet (called 4,938.91 feet) a 5/8" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "RPLS 3636" found for reference at the southeast comer of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "TRACT 196-A" tract, which said TRACT 196-A tract is so designated and is described in that certain instrument (tiffed "RIGHT-OF-WAY EASEMENT") from Di Vemon McFaddin Kibodeaux, formedy Di Vemon McFaddin Cordts, joined therein by her husband, Oren J. Kibedeaux to Jefferson County Drainage Distdct No. 7 dated January 4, 1968 and recorded in Volume 1531, Page 123 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County Texas, and passing at a distance of 5,430.99 feet (called 5,431.07 feet) the hereinbefore said 5/8" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "RPLS 3636" found for reference at the southwest comer of the said TRACT 196-A tract, and continuing (West) along and with the said south line of the PAEDC tract and north line of the Ward tract, a total distance of 5,545.27 feet (called 5,545.35 feet) to a point for the southwest comer of the said tract herein described, the said comer being the southwest comer of the said PAEDC tract, and the said comer also being the northwest comer of the said Ward tract, and the said comer being in the eastedy line of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "TRACT A" tract, which said TRACT A tract is so designated and is described in that certain instrument from Dading Klaver, et al to Jefferson County Drainage Distdct No. 7 dated November 22, 1971 and recorded in Volume 1727, Page 481 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County, Texas, and the said comer being in the centedine of Rhodiar Gully; Page 13 of 15 THENCE North 12° 17' 39" West (celled North 11° 54' 13" West) along and with the westedy line of the said PAEDC tract, the said eastedy line of the TRACT A tract and said centedine of Rhodair Gully, a distance of 724.96 feet (called 724.92 feet) to a point for the most westerly northwest comer of the said tract herein described, the said comer being the most westedy northwest comer of the said PAEDC tract, and the said comer also being the most southerly comer of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "J.L.C. McFeddin" tract, which said J.L.C. McFaddin tract is designated "TRACT NO. 12-C" and is described in the hereinbefore referenced instrument recorded in Volume 692, Page 22 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County, Texas, and which said TRACT NO. 12-Q is indiceted on the hereinbefore referenced plat of record in Volume 8, Page 110 of the Map Records of Jefferson County, Texas; THENCE North 39° 57' 00" East (celled North 40° 20' 00" East) along and with the most westerly northwest line of the said PAEDC tract and most southerly southeast line of the said J.L.C. McFaddin tract, passing at a distance of 132.53 feet (celled 132.53 feet) a 5/8" iron rod with a yellow cep stamped "RPLS 3636" found for reference at the northwest comer of the hereinbefore said TRACT 196-A tract, and passing at a distance of 736.10 feet (celled 735.85 feet) a 5/8" iron rod with a red plastic cep stamped "S&P INC" set for reference at the northeast comer of the said TRACT 196-A tract (and which said 5/8" iron rod with a red plastic cep set for reference is North 37° 58' 15" West a distance of 0.39 feet from a 5/8" iron rod with a yellow cep stamped "RPLS 3636" found for reference), and continuing (North 39° 57' 00" Ease) along and with the said most westerly northwest line of the PAEDC tract and most southerly southeast line of the J.L.C. McFaddin tract, a total distance of 3,925.49 feet (celled 3,925.61 feet) to a ¼" iron rod found for the most northerly comer of the said tract herein described, the said comer being the most northerly comer of the said PAEDC tract, and the said comer also being the most westedy comer of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "Bamette - 1483/177" tract, which said Bamette - 1483/177 tract is described in that certain instrument from Gulf Refining Company to N.K. Bamette, Jr. dated October 24, 1966 and recorded in Volume 1483, Page 177 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County, Texas; THENCE South 49° 46' 07" East (celled South 49° 23' 24" East) along and with the most northerly northeast line of said PAEDC tract and southwesterly line of the said Bartnette - 1483/177 tract, a distance of 1,317.60 feet (celled 1,317.54 feet) to a ½" iron rod found for an intedor comer of the said tract herein described, the said comer being an intedor comer of the said PAEDC tract, and the said comer also being the most southerly corner of the said Bamette - 1483/177 tract; THENCE North 40° 07' 58" East (celled North 40° 33' 04" East) along and with the most eastedy northwest line of the said PAEDC tract and southeasterly line of the said Bamette - 1483/177 tract, a distance of 151.95 feet (celled 151.86 feet) to a 5/8" iron rod with a yellow cep stamped "RPLS 3636" found for the most eastedy northwest comer of the said tract herein described, the said comer being the most eastedy northwest comer of the said PAEDC tract, and the said comer also being the most westedy comer of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "Bamette - 1483/176" tract, which said Bamette - 1483/176 tract is described in that certain instrument from Di Vemon McFaddin Cordts joined therein by her husband, Edwin G. Cordts to N.K. Bamette, Jr. dated October 11, 1966 Page 14 of 15 and recorded in Volume 1483, Page 176 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County, Texas, and the said 5/8" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "RPLS 3636" found for comer being South 40° 11' 19" West (called South 40° 33' 04" West) along and with the said southeasterly line of the Bamette - 1483/177 tract, northwesterly line of the said Bamette - 1483/176 tract and southeasterly line of that certain tract of land herein referred to as the "LNVA" tract, which said LNVA tract is described in that certain instrument from Gulf Refining Company to the Lower Neches Valley Authority dated Apdl 8, 1975 and recorded in Volume 1876, Page 290 of the Deed Records of Jefferson County, Texas, a total distance of 499.44 feet (called 500.00 feet) from a 5/8" iron rod found for the most northerly comer of the said Bamette - 1483/176 tract, the said comer also being the most eastedy comer of the said LNVA tract, and the said comer being in the hereinbefore said southwesterly right-of- way line of Texas State Highway Spur 93; THENCE South 83° 44' 08" East (called South 83° 21' 35" East) along and with the most eastedy north line of the said PAEDC tract and southerly line of the said Bamette - 1483/176 tract, a distance of 557.12 feet (called 557.12 feet) to a 5/8" iron rod found for the most northerly northeast comer of the said tract herein described, the said comer being the most northerly northeast comer of the said PAEDC tract, and the said comer also being the most northerly northwest comer of the hereinbefore said Parcel 31 tract, and the said comer being in the said southwesterly right-of-way line of Texas State Highway Spur 93, and the said 5/8" iron rod found for comer being South 27° 38' 14" East (called South 27° 11' 44" East) along and with the said southwesterly fight-of-way line of Texas State Highway Spur 93, a distance of 499.26 feet (called 499.56 feet) from the hereinbefore said 5/8" iron rod found for the most northerly comer of the Bamette - 1483/176 tract and most eastedy comer of the LNVA tract; THENCE South 27° 30' 14" East (called South 27° 07' 03" East) along and with the most easterly northeast line of the said PAEDC tract, southwesterly line of the said Parcel 31 tract and said southwesterly right-or-way line of Texas State Highway Spur 93, a total distance of 3,294.33 feet (called 3,294.40 feet) to the Point of Beginning and Containing 297.960 acres (called 297.9732 acres) of land, more or less. Prepared by Schaumburg & Polk, Inc. E. James Verrett, Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 1781 Page 15 of 15